X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	bh=q/h7iRzXXe8mKbBIDDIw2rCYB0MYW1tZJyN6RIEPHmw=;
	b=O5bsGLjyfa2Z//D7w53SpJ1RzHy00IL/b8tcCiMKVSTpsxCBPo22tWbUu30XrQxrBf
	FoPbDpBa6MRb/dIvQ81vW7xxQDMnWQ1gbzlAYFEBj4MvyABWK1CdfKBMFa9hyYAmhoCb
	453mAHLbAe2Rf6GcvAkajFgfr1pYGAZmN+5WLMISfmH1GB6BM+Q/LBkOgH44ROfyBTkk
	aiv5Hx41aZOFJc+skPy5FIriddWF9AsENv4TZ51dld7tan+mS5PM2hjjWpxRVwGmvPjg
	u/ArSGA+DzCm+x5uYEJoTQGvoErbrggO2ap+Cj6/lTyNf/KMjoRzUxPaIkD138G7WZY0
	8yMA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQl5CivxYlJXpMHM+M9gXshdI6V3mj2ae32AFbF/e2WJD93+X9SaUix7A7XDuv0Och1v2x+j
X-Received:	by 10.112.219.70 with SMTP id pm6mr38231984lbc.41.1435990405422;
	Fri, 03 Jul 2015 23:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	mjd AT hackvana DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[120.21.162.27]
In-Reply-To:	<20150703030409.32398.qmail@stuge.se>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
From:	"Mitch Davis (mjd+geda-user AT hackvana DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 4 Jul 2015 16:13:05 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth:	i3aOVpM8fLB_bbr0Qd7lP0utTp0
Message-ID:	<CA+KzSgJM1U3vtxbH+9biKkpF+cp92Ts4jqZaKnr=QMgO+JaYoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--001a11c3ccd804364d051a069242
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage and development is
> > nearly death is wrong?
>
> Look, open source software development can not die! I react quite
> strongly indeed to those who throw this ridiculous expression around!
>

Maybe that was his intention.  If so, seems to have worked.

(grumble troll grumble)

Mitch.

--001a11c3ccd804364d051a069242
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Peter Stuge =
(<a href=3D"mailto:peter AT stuge DOT se">peter AT stuge DOT se</a>) [via <a href=3D"mail=
to:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;=
<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delori=
e.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=
=3D"">Stefan Salewski wrote:<br>
&gt; maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage and development is<br>
&gt; nearly death is wrong?<br>
<br>
</span>Look, open source software development can not die! I react quite<br=
>
strongly indeed to those who throw this ridiculous expression around!<br></=
blockquote><div><br>Maybe that was his intention.=C2=A0 If so, seems to hav=
e worked.<br><br>(grumble troll grumble)<br><br>Mitch.<br></div></div>

--001a11c3ccd804364d051a069242--

- Raw text -