X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=5AAOecyqi7wXQ/zv6Iy5kmRyp3EwnDR+dNtbK1+qUq8=;
	b=jIsaextyQETeU4TAUDB0Sd5a5j2z+HFX4++VpQMg12fc6z8MdHRlZ1DxsOXQbjPZLb
	cmmv5Z2Gvx1RT1ZwPDBL1nt/LZJK0HSy5pWkWAYtCpCK36kGM33RTxYxu3Q9AsskEcWG
	CWCrYQZ+hzGMBgfXP671Dx8PlIo7O6VVR0t2QzndCLeEwWQEC0wUof/M0Q8T9olII+2a
	Yl/Pq2OPpjXeYtmw3lyii6zv7hQtnjpjaEABvKsLLCZ5/Vf8bgBOGfMLFRxlJOIA8wCR
	7Yoiv9Vg+uhYzT1q2jhSfh8uBobrBlH3b1mxcEiFMT0+DrrEdWYxFo/qS0iAMsWMIN+M
	muVw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr21447405laj.69.1435696763304;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<5592fc59.8b1f450a.1342.10e6@mx.google.com>
References:	<5592E9B1 DOT 9030908 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<5592fc59 DOT 8b1f450a DOT 1342 DOT 10e6 AT mx DOT google DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:39:23 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhT7WrjQxxMZZ2qEK_ArZdFk7e1pRg2vCmb2YjtM20QibQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Lilith the issue is not a fight over 2D vs 3D drawing. The issue is
over how the 2D drawing is handled in code. The source code to PCB is
kind of troublesome to add onto.

I am grateful to it's authors but I must acknowledge that it needs
some added care.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Lilith Bryant (dark141 AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On 2015-07-01 07:10:41 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>   I'm sorry, but you're wrong.  In my case, I am an electronics
>> hobbyist, but I've also been a commercial designer for about 25 years.
>> I'm betting I'm not the only professional designer here.
>>
>
> Raises my hand as another professional designer.
>
> Nothing in orbit (yet!),  but I do have hundreds of instances
> of my 2000+ rat designs running in factories around the globe.
>
> I *love* the fact that PCB is at it's core a 2D drawing program.  KISS.
>
> I particularly *love* that lines aren't married to nets.  Every other
> layout program I've tried (including some $$$) make a royal hash of that.
> PCB doesn't tie itself up in knots.
>
> There's a few annoyances in PCB that I'll getting around to fixing one
> day, but all and all,  it's my pick over even the high $$$ systems.
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -