delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Jun 30, 2015, at 10:05 AM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > On 06/30/2015 11:24 AM, John Doty wrote: >> No. I find it incomprehensible. A good tool would construct complex >> objects out of simpler ones, with trivially simple objects at the >> bottom. But PCB can’t do that: it’s just a mess of special-purpose >> hacks that interact in peculiar and confusing ways. This makes PCB >> very rigid and difficult to use. > > This is getting very old, John. > > If you don't like PCB, don't use it. I don’t. > > If you don't like PCB but want to use it, do something to "fix" it. I don’t want to fix it. I just want it kept separate from geda-gaf. One should not design a space age transportation system around the needs of oxcarts. > > Do something constructive. You mean like https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi? Or the other two gnetlist back ends I posted to the list yesterday? Or the stuff on my gedasymbols page? I also have improved Allegro and PADS back ends that I hope to get around to publishing soon. > Don't just sit there and spout off with > your obvious hatred for PCB. Don’t just sit there and defend a broken program. Where are your contributions? John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |