X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=D27dV5rZGkaniysQUAeFxEjPlbbCNONvXrurgIrsSpk=;
	b=DJHoP8rgppupsyGldhTkSWRAgkaZ28Rtm4IYyfagK5WtBR7Q88xkH70zmt7NADVLbH
	CislPdLwLcGkekIUDtkOZOJjYVj67rBNpdARalT0s6dF8JUB2GqOtRiouFonn7BtVGaP
	rZeZ09F2i/Ld8qbUrxoP/D9FHZ+9CXfv7t1Xxa+e1tiQoJ9MB6bJjgt/3NCgOm90t6Mq
	W6heppzzKuYJU0wqy0OYoEKheFzDyvz3Y1h7vZ8TE4BzedPezDqxQ4btmg/QEDeUNICm
	+8FaTiAsjQpDNjX8HXXoY6Z/RKg6pw/KOrM12jtTHB4y7mEoCGz7lHTKfJomhzo6h9UX
	kHFw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.190.10 with SMTP id gm10mr19767453lbc.2.1435677969210;
	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<5592ABB1.7090404@plastitar.com>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150630083528 DOT GY19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1435666431 DOT 676 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAM2RGhQ75UcoEoz4zeEcyEShj+8C8ACJj4-iB7F1r+jyy+bUvw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5833A5F3-C17B-409D-A3B3-553F9DCFEAC5 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<5592ABB1 DOT 7090404 AT plastitar DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:26:08 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTo9oB4ddZvLzwkGbvfJU9XxngzC1k4OZaM6apTeW5Fng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t5UFQEQA006897
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

John Doty, From a workflow perspective it would help. The codes
structure is a whole other bag of worms.

DJ, You have added substantially to PCB but the issues we are citing
were there far far before your involvement. I know you are not a fan
of when people rip on PCB, I just want to be clear we are looking at
it and not you.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:46 AM, P. Taylor <phil AT plastitar DOT com> wrote:
> On 6/30/2015 10:19 AM, John Doty wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 30, 2015, at 7:59 AM, Evan Foss
>> (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)<geda-user AT delorie DOT com>  wrote:
>>
>>> >John Doty : In the name of a more open workflow I was advocating PCB
>>> >changing/adding TSV as an accepted input format for the other
>>> >attributes I was suggesting. The idea being to break out of the
>>> >workflow issues you see in PCB.
>>> >
>>
>> Wouldn’t help in the least bit. The core issue with PCB is that it has no
>> coherent model of what a PCB is: it’s just a grab bag of “features” with no
>> foundation.
>
>
> John,
>
> I always enjoy hearing your outspoken comments on geda/PCB.  But isn't the
> indeterminate nature of PCB a good thing?  It's abstract _and_ it works for
> practical physical design.  And its easy to hack and hotwire for different
> situations.
>
> The foundation is clearly there: it's the code and the file formats.  It
> works and that's why we like it.
>
> There are highly determinate commercial offerings.  Yet PCB is the maximum
> software attainable by a small number of uncoordinated programmers,
> particularly when one considers that there are different desires and
> philosophies constantly at odds.
>
> Phil Taylor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -