X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201506292052.t5TKqSM6010435@envy.delorie.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:34:36 -0600
Message-Id:	<D39534B1-B1CB-4DC8-BC3B-E86D97B4E734@noqsi.com>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz> <1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <D8B09027-EF94-4C8D-ADC8-C5CCEAC36552 AT noqsi DOT com> <1435599996 DOT 2704 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <B8DD3FDA-D554-4DCD-A97D-42CE7215A5CB AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhTqnxzn5NAS10aQC+6Ws0k6TwJjYVo8iuL6QA7h1OA6uA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <A1F2575D-4FE7-498B-A8A1-F10ADF1DCD8F AT noqsi DOT com> <201506292052 DOT t5TKqSM6010435 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t5TLYg5I023876
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Jun 29, 2015, at 2:52 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> If the pcb netlister wants to pull extra info out of a schematic for
> its own use, that means the netlister's flexibility (something you are
> harping on all the time) is being used in a useful target-specific
> way.

That depends on the design. Well-factored design is not automatic.

>  This flexibility is something you push as a godsend for every
> target EXCEPT pcb.

Nonsense. If not for geda-gaf’s flexibility, PCB would be dead, I think. Keeping geda-gaf well-factored and avoiding PCB-specific shortcuts will be good for PCB as well.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -