X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=qJ5V5stJ9drdy36xmKgg0ohRrffV6N7Gb2//TrJ4QXc=;
	b=MLGurNFE5ePUb/8QYYOJJpx0/tPcywNIW1TtZTRhYGF2zlsP01HwdrSQRhgHz3Vu3T
	vh/K8HFNQT8tyv2cfGOPYW/RJG8OjXjo+k1UzsyD7XJm+/+SVvEobJYhkrxLXE10s/ZH
	AiWsfdUtCKf/Uz01L5e/ugk0qFoFMwr/lMDCdEXENhr2moiB5dtf7aJTnpqRB29bF63T
	j++VL/DQPcB7gp4ztQuxPxy+pDqSSX0IY/EEWq+AJdFcT3eGGMNs7JkBgOAJE4snVqs3
	GZCTw6hKorx15RNq4ImRTLlidVAS2q6LIGpxsBoKgfL9f2DSdVQrhpHQqiJakBxAM9b/
	v7mQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr15280834laj.69.1435600232562;
	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:50:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhTHg8Rrib+6+gigviKYcWCpR4ifYTg_cBWbqJJppwM=hA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<B43B3AB8-2421-4719-8E03-611366BD1BD8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<1435598480 DOT 2704 DOT 2 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAM2RGhTHg8Rrib+6+gigviKYcWCpR4ifYTg_cBWbqJJppwM=hA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:50:32 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhS3CkHwc4woK=bV_EGCV5RaANRLSmk1dMUOSbiRThk2vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Stefan Salewski : Yes no one doing production would ever trust the
internet to provide a footprint. Mostly because small mechanical
margins can mean that stuff can look right with out fitting perfectly
when a pick and place machine runs. Of course if we had vetted
footprints that might change. At least vetted footprints would help
the hobbyist community a lot. I trust the stuff on geda-symbols way
more than say something for eaglecad.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Jan Kasprzak I was thinking about that same thing last night. The
> thing is that one of the nicer things about gEDA is that it is not
> dependent on some web based platform. I suspect that is why every time
> anything like that has been suggested it has died off. We need a way
> to let people rate and comment on symbols and footprints which works
> on top of SVN, GIT or what ever. Having a file with authenticated
> votes and comments from other users next to each symbol & footprint
> would make more sense.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 10:32 -0600, John Doty wrote:
>>> I use multiline attributes frequently.
>>
>> That is interesting. I think long time ago I saw a recommendation
>> somewhere to use multiline text not for attributes. It is great that we
>> can use it, I will check how gschem displays it.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Home
> http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
> Work
> http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -