X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=OlbCB0wUKKIU/lKtbX4P5TRmNaAHSUkxfO2VuWezXBo=;
	b=X3Bvkf2pNsbWZPq9mMNk3gGYNHIwf7RZBnfWCkydVPF+85frOWGdejeklklF87xgS8
	cEKihFfia/ZlupuxXjkzAPlYf22hgwhSBR4tggdBAH8+VIzMqgZzNkZGZahz5V+xoQGO
	Mn1/JZkV/vzvUTkBFM9kwBpIE9vhuvcA06Fz5lmgRVCUaqhLfQdlR64R3Us/VTGZq95b
	U0V5s9Q9vUyNOBsARVhNLWMKnguXlNhU1dFlgGOu3ZTW8HsGXQlofpk8/9ilQ/Z9xyDF
	/pN5rIYCb2TjEqQKAwC+Z/irNRRqgq/3YmLv3aVo48ZAiSnTQ81lfKuyiHQhlgYQFkm7
	HefA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.222.133 with SMTP id qm5mr15372849lbc.86.1435599904703;
	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<1435598480.2704.2.camel@ssalewski.de>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150629113018 DOT GH19654 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<1435581145 DOT 1447 DOT 19 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAOFvGD7npho6fPKAEmce6L1nXy=5EEsVaEH-Vj_XEuiLddodDA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1435592698 DOT 1607 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<B43B3AB8-2421-4719-8E03-611366BD1BD8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<1435598480 DOT 2704 DOT 2 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 13:45:04 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTHg8Rrib+6+gigviKYcWCpR4ifYTg_cBWbqJJppwM=hA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Jan Kasprzak I was thinking about that same thing last night. The
thing is that one of the nicer things about gEDA is that it is not
dependent on some web based platform. I suspect that is why every time
anything like that has been suggested it has died off. We need a way
to let people rate and comment on symbols and footprints which works
on top of SVN, GIT or what ever. Having a file with authenticated
votes and comments from other users next to each symbol & footprint
would make more sense.



On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 10:32 -0600, John Doty wrote:
>> I use multiline attributes frequently.
>
> That is interesting. I think long time ago I saw a recommendation
> somewhere to use multiline text not for attributes. It is great that we
> can use it, I will check how gschem displays it.
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -