delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=gVg5enX/c1L/lvlh7LObBlNTQUF1boKvhy5dzFcJcMc=; | |
b=q+N3rsKB5KDw8BKL3w3/IV+DzzXCdBz61oYWHBpazZFPwMamD0b69dpMdxrUr/HTUo | |
VHDi1jvNajVBNANLC0cpQO9kzUS+WdEXLAkc9vn5XjQ7ak5t2eLsfVwGWbsdOP5yf+8Y | |
7HBu3Q9MZZT/+juR7S3iK8EchYDfznCn1LsFM7oKYvcxIv0ync03dJQwz36S2mTg/Qs6 | |
GeTyMgVQxBFP/kK4HDindlRRYKjXbqeLwaG6sX6L2oI4ghVxs7DUG6TmCM3kUoRBKrv7 | |
byPm7w3sQx5RUCIPui0IWS8JU3VULG24X2Asph6zn9/CrdXCDncJy6k0S09DKHEmxvpM | |
CNTA== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.112.222.133 with SMTP id qm5mr10777409lbc.86.1435517383322; |
Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:49:43 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1506281932040.6924@igor2priv> |
References: | <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> |
<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> | |
Date: | Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:49:43 +0000 |
Message-ID: | <CAM2RGhREeJEXhXhj2Guq-pnswDbY_aWp-_PTYeAC0e4yb93_yw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
From: | "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
I have been using it since 2004 for home/school and at work since 2009. I have no idea what gave you the impression it was dead. gschem reached a level of refinement that has basically meant no additional features were needed. Great work developers! On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:35 PM, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) wrote: > >> On 06/28/2015 12:52 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote: >>> >>> Recently I saw some messages on gEDA list, last was something about >>> Python netlister just now. So maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage >>> and development is nearly death is wrong? >> >> >> I don't know why you would have that impression. I use it almost >> every day, I just don't talk about it much on the mailing list unless I >> am looking for help with something. I suspect it's the same for much of >> the user base. > > > Me too. I did a lot of hobby projects and a few projects for a company with > gEDA. > > I am happy that there are no new releases of gschem stuffed with new > features - for me, gschem is complete. > > Regards, > > Igor2 > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |