delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:35:09 +0200 (CEST) |
X-X-Sender: | igor2 AT igor2priv |
To: | "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
X-Debug: | to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" |
From: | gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
In-Reply-To: | <55902AB9.9000004@neurotica.com> |
Message-ID: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1506281932040.6924@igor2priv> |
References: | <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) wrote: > On 06/28/2015 12:52 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote: >> Recently I saw some messages on gEDA list, last was something about >> Python netlister just now. So maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage >> and development is nearly death is wrong? > > I don't know why you would have that impression. I use it almost > every day, I just don't talk about it much on the mailing list unless I > am looking for help with something. I suspect it's the same for much of > the user base. Me too. I did a lot of hobby projects and a few projects for a company with gEDA. I am happy that there are no new releases of gschem stuffed with new features - for me, gschem is complete. Regards, Igor2
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |