X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=26DBMkIu0RVrffH9Oymq2M/hsIeC9ukPMrQ9u9NKKvQ=;
	b=emuzX2CcVcOziHtvrJC+p1QYNZiCK1epLehDY0YSFgVA7ZFORUz0Hg8A9MJV/6OO1H
	At2dbw8DQFH4Ar2rT5uIvY6Rlx9FnNPhOHK2UyH7UgVOZK4Ut46S5oajaPEg28kMU2i1
	F6tkO1HVHT02Ud9kKiVfcuBhA1Lmte1BUGYiy2yykbbE4HUvd7+lgWa9n7UL5wOigxIv
	4R0kmeFSCfW5CP9U0BApOtCqhSMYO2tdW9EeGIHnskGD1ikA8UfjPp7dhhl1Vfv/NZDa
	z88PzJv/3zW6wnXyxyuMJ4FkMJJvcsIMv+w+0qX0QHvn20mlyH3sZr77TDVVZedwJ5Zb
	IPVg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.60.124.20 with SMTP id me20mr12916038oeb.86.1432450959186;
	Sun, 24 May 2015 00:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201505240134.t4O1YnYq000593@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<CAC4O8c-G9gLnnxm3byvhX09e2rT4V-Ryqv1UuA-5NcqU2VSn3g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505240134 DOT t4O1YnYq000593 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 23 May 2015 23:02:39 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_QC_sh-EmUU_fO+6T1QdQWZUKbQFEyhoc1311Sr7eOiA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB short detection not working why?
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:34 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
> There are no settings to disable short detection, as it only happens
> when you press 'o' anyway.
>
> Historically, the most common reason for "shorts not detected" is a
> misconfigured stackup, so that things you think should be shorting are
> really on separate copper layers.

Looks like it was me not getting around to running ExecuteFile(circ.cmd)

I think this came about because I was finally getting to playing around with
Import Schematics.  I notice it does some things differently, for example
it doesn't seem to nuke deleted parts like gsch2pcb does.  Is there a note
somewhere explaining the differences, or can you summarize them briefly?

Thanks,
Britton

- Raw text -