X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB and gschem libraries
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1504021956130.25799@igor2priv>
Date:	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:26:36 -0600
Message-Id:	<E747ED7F-626B-4326-B85C-CAEFFFDB554B@noqsi.com>
References:	<1427905808 DOT 32608 DOT 60 DOT camel AT benjamin-hp-g70> <20150401214846 DOT 5d2261e6 AT jive> <201504011954 DOT t31JsnKh020289 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150401221210 DOT 1b4a299e AT jive> <201504012014 DOT t31KEq1m020861 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <551C574F DOT 2030708 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CA+uY=MTgd=aS-vyUE8RHcHZr+dJjtBe_h4yAFANPi6VBPUPVhQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504020454050 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv> <CA+uY=MT=Td=0VMgHfRcQtuYYTx7v8YVNCmFPn353Liki9QTTSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504021718120 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv> <CA+uY=MQyuhrSuWSu0Z8FHFX3B9TYr13cxLWgxOysar-yyZ6y8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504021812560 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv> <CA+uY=MSNf7NbVntf++G5ne3-33ihwvkEjZH7tot0S2SLjfO6cg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CA+uY=MTW=X=V16vnyJmnfekDfYz20k831tOgj_4eBMSR4zg4Cg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4DE58696-8D37-4EB8-8181-F66B547575C7 AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504021956130 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t32IQfqo030411
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Apr 2, 2015, at 11:58 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:

> I still don't see how/when/by-whom the current lib would be replaced to whatever new lib the community agrees on.

I can’t see how that could ever happen. The current symbol library is frozen in its present state by the fact that the geda-gaf tools use symbols from it by reference. Replacing it would break most existing gEDA projects. The most workable thing might be to have a hierarchy of symbol libraries, with “Essentials”, “Advanced”, “Contributed”, and “Legacy” at the top. Sort out the currently distributed symbols between “Essentials”, “Advanced”, and “Legacy”, but keep them all.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -