X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:58:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB and gschem libraries
In-Reply-To:	<4DE58696-8D37-4EB8-8181-F66B547575C7@noqsi.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1504021956130.25799@igor2priv>
References:	<1427905808 DOT 32608 DOT 60 DOT camel AT benjamin-hp-g70> <20150401214846 DOT 5d2261e6 AT jive> <201504011954 DOT t31JsnKh020289 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150401221210 DOT 1b4a299e AT jive> <201504012014 DOT t31KEq1m020861 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <551C574F DOT 2030708 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<CA+uY=MTgd=aS-vyUE8RHcHZr+dJjtBe_h4yAFANPi6VBPUPVhQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504020454050 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv> <CA+uY=MT=Td=0VMgHfRcQtuYYTx7v8YVNCmFPn353Liki9QTTSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504021718120 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv>
	<CA+uY=MQyuhrSuWSu0Z8FHFX3B9TYr13cxLWgxOysar-yyZ6y8A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1504021812560 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv> <CA+uY=MSNf7NbVntf++G5ne3-33ihwvkEjZH7tot0S2SLjfO6cg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CA+uY=MTW=X=V16vnyJmnfekDfYz20k831tOgj_4eBMSR4zg4Cg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<4DE58696-8D37-4EB8-8181-F66B547575C7 AT noqsi DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 2 Apr 2015, John Doty wrote:

>
>On Apr 2, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Russell Nelson <russnelson AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
>      But you could just as easily say that trying to present the
>      entire library to a new user is chaotic. Hrm.
>
>
>I think Kai-Martin?s ?essentials? library succeeds rather well as a starting
>point. The hard part afterward is damping down the expectation that
>expanding the library will proportionally expand capability. Any common
>library is guaranteed to fall short of user needs once you get beyond the
>simplest projects.

I agree. I've made a few remarks on some details (like German names), but 
generally I think too that Kai-Martin's essential lib looks better than 
the current stock library shipped with gschem/pcb.

I still don't see how/when/by-whom the current lib would be replaced to 
whatever new lib the community agrees on.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -