delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references | |
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to | |
:user-agent; | |
bh=ML6VAHtUS3cBiG9V+iNLnuubDPMzrYLxcox1KOzccqs=; | |
b=ORb0P9+gxpSJHd/4yKu0jPRJYTJwlPUhQLEz3kE+4zyZh58WcWvEKRzLiMpMRY078A | |
zBCM2xY9H6blsPE3ryx6T368ixQFyvk95mpdIW+rYcfxLx7k7RlvxQZStyCoWMwmZ7tU | |
330jykNyFEdkez3cG/djv1T9FRW9vgsW6rupYXMGoNsWAgzejuQNWP3NZF5v3RrjY65F | |
2SnlGRzhxvWYJ9iAgTGMeaDsojjhByUWIW6tDHwOb9209mGZqwir0kOiLs/xn8/QOqwm | |
rR3RZSB9xHjryLFukBwbixJ9MhiJcvTs5uk9TDLxOIQm9cky78Q8MaL0ugiTCGReM7W0 | |
LHAQ== | |
X-Received: | by 10.152.28.233 with SMTP id e9mr3195423lah.3.1427193996300; |
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 03:46:36 -0700 (PDT) | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:46:34 +0300 |
From: | Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gschem edits vanishing |
Message-ID: | <20150324104634.GB25693@localhost.localdomain> |
Mail-Followup-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <550D5F43 DOT 7020501 AT earthlink DOT net> |
<1427055675 DOT 10088 DOT 11 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> | |
<20150323185439 DOT GA2429 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
<5510D488 DOT 3070309 AT earthlink DOT net> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <5510D488.3070309@earthlink.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM -0500, David W. Schultz wrote: > On 03/23/2015 01:54 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote: > > ... and using a CMS helps to avoid such mistakes. > > > > Once it reaches the point where I am ready to get boards fabbed, I will > use git for version control. But that wouldn't help here because at this > point there is only the one copy. Unless you count that tarball thing > that the backup program produced that lives on storage media that is > only ever connected when I am doing a backup. It would help because - you always can see uncommitted changes - you can revert any unwanted change even if you've committed it - every time you can see what difference was introduced using graphical diff Cheers, Vladimir
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |