Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/03/19/09:19:31
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Bernhard Kraft wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some idea which came out of the long "pcb alternatives" thread was to
> create a structured footprint library as alternative to the existing
> newlib, pcblib, pcb-newlib libraries.
>
> As a first step I would suggest we define the directory structure to
> be used. Instead of starting this directly in some cvs/svn/git, and as
> it is NOT POSSIBLE to create empty directories in git (major fail! :)
> I would suggest we create this structure at some online shared editing
> facility.
>
> Suggestions:
> * Google docs
> * www.codeshare.io
> Other suggestions? Someone complained about sites making heavy use of
> JS. I hope either one of above suggestions is suitable for your
> system.
Yeah, it was me, but I may not be alone with preference to
whatever-my-favorite-text-editor over web2.0 stuff. There might be plain
"web 1.0" services out there, tho. Maybe a page on the geda wiki, or a
talk page there? I recall trac also worked fine without JS.
As of non-web solutions:
Maybe cvs on gedasymbols?
I can also create an svn repo on repo.hu if that helps (but I don't want
to push svn too much, and especially don't want to trigger another VCS
thread).
Regards,
Igor2
- Raw text -