delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=A8gkOqiyTSftipZqCj5YBY5DnLlVMj5IPE66oYU3gv8=; | |
b=UwKc4WyyiGWB7XmxtoTqEOQAh+LWYHpVZt5e0a3/+MrJ03wWU1TE1xGjPKoUby8Gg2 | |
Va9vj1hG8iV58ee8x3ikv+1lQFz+iRqXoeXR2pCSY1TUE/F7GacRKxn6ke/z8HOEAXX4 | |
SM4ohsYySNVXvc1bmH7xadKLj8fnBL75TJX0kB4rZllpbJRRgiA2eZkdQsmQvHEF4woR | |
30tUZskbc4t/qZetFDqeicmaFOEodEpmniE8nEWrFiMq6hQxXps/VtlxOMrPzJOzwQNc | |
WlHum6M4PHfAhnAhtbWowlx2Md2mcbd3iPhXYcoaEkAeNZeC60Tf+GsmZAzQ5wJKgjLJ | |
xsRg== | |
X-Received: | by 10.194.60.77 with SMTP id f13mr154252439wjr.105.1426771155911; |
Thu, 19 Mar 2015 06:19:15 -0700 (PDT) | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAGYR9vcvNsy2YPZ9PRUQX4h8qzJn1Cn9UwHehsOSdsq_ALoNAQ@mail.gmail.com> |
References: | <CAGYR9vcvNsy2YPZ9PRUQX4h8qzJn1Cn9UwHehsOSdsq_ALoNAQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
From: | Filippo Micheletti <filippomicheletti AT gmail DOT com> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:18:35 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <CAHBVutDLHUDf_nG8qqt5s3jrPPg6+FicEdgt7NN=r2cWbCZqTA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Structured footprint library |
To: | MAILING LIST gEDA-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--047d7b86db8aec8bc40511a40b5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Using propertary services like Google ones it's not exactely free-software compliant... anyway I agree with the desire to create a new, well structured footprint library, maybe with a more easy-to-use access than a cvs based one, but unfortunaltely I have no suggestions. - Filippo - On 19 March 2015 at 13:52, Bernhard Kraft <bkraf0j9 AT gmail DOT com> wrote: > Hi, > > Some idea which came out of the long "pcb alternatives" thread was to > create a structured footprint library as alternative to the existing > newlib, pcblib, pcb-newlib libraries. > > As a first step I would suggest we define the directory structure to > be used. Instead of starting this directly in some cvs/svn/git, and as > it is NOT POSSIBLE to create empty directories in git (major fail! :) > I would suggest we create this structure at some online shared editing > facility. > > Suggestions: > * Google docs > * www.codeshare.io > > Other suggestions? Someone complained about sites making heavy use of > JS. I hope either one of above suggestions is suitable for your > system. > > > greetings, > Bernhard > --047d7b86db8aec8bc40511a40b5e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Using propertary services like Google ones it's not ex= actely free-software compliant...<div>anyway I agree with the desire to cre= ate a new, well structured footprint library, maybe with a more easy-to-use= access than a cvs based one, but unfortunaltely I have no suggestions.</di= v></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gma= il_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><br>- Filippo -</div></div></div></div> <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 19 March 2015 at 13:52, Bernhard Kraft <s= pan dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bkraf0j9 AT gmail DOT com" target=3D"_blank"= >bkraf0j9 AT gmail DOT com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo= te" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"= >Hi,<br> <br> Some idea which came out of the long "pcb alternatives" thread wa= s to<br> create a structured footprint library as alternative to the existing<br> newlib, pcblib, pcb-newlib libraries.<br> <br> As a first step I would suggest we define the directory structure to<br> be used. Instead of starting this directly in some cvs/svn/git, and as<br> it is NOT POSSIBLE to create empty directories in git (major fail! :)<br> I would suggest we create this structure at some online shared editing<br> facility.<br> <br> Suggestions:<br> =C2=A0 * Google docs<br> =C2=A0 * <a href=3D"http://www.codeshare.io" target=3D"_blank">www.codeshar= e.io</a><br> <br> Other suggestions? Someone complained about sites making heavy use of<br> JS. I hope either one of above suggestions is suitable for your<br> system.<br> <br> <br> greetings,<br> Bernhard<br> </blockquote></div><br></div> --047d7b86db8aec8bc40511a40b5e--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |