X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=f3t20e3RJs83nUYXhRcMEJPy3fOoKM5X/ayQrD53igc=;
	b=YwRq+FqCZVoJMeakmBgwfDs9kQD3cXNBOz3Y720smSX8kuLCaW18XGSUpt1IJ+61ss
	Y5QUABCcgEM7gO3klXmZr3LG2Lb7OCThMVEhs41qEGXfXTrcuRW/CjgP2rFr3ReuuMtD
	z+S38UMn3/1d9QIrhVDicyuQBvBHOQFE0QaaRsyQyOukMPOXPupY0Fylyq0HkfZ27Ipy
	2kZ0U6haZUXiee/oIDjfIXfVyUVYS7QEgbXNBMMKcPASd+/Iy5n27F2Uof7UqIzuyyBz
	F8Brt05P76gNpYixRBFqcttGthVRHkGXq0tlCHi2aE+AiZtxMutsE4tMNIkpY9/pqTUb
	YekQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.55.31.91 with SMTP id f88mr106762856qkf.91.1426685195280;
	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 06:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1503180827170.25799@igor2priv>
References:	<CAHLh21Cdm=YZuqCQ+gCHSviJquahr6cnAQ-VBLR4BSs-nfHOig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD4+4bHXNYLvePi70wb_1A4=dQgb_Ov3xBghoKbXQUsSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5508413E DOT 4000405 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<46050a0c DOT 619 DOT 14c2850d052 DOT Webtop DOT 45 AT optonline DOT net>
	<CAGYR9veihi_M+B0HXptGYQLMO8=B_KOLM2wmrRNkMLG_9MdQrA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1503180357520 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv>
	<CAGYR9ve_n7VmZ8x-jCQK5eKHMNGp6an9o8EwYZnWQWFiCpGnXg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1503180827170 DOT 25799 AT igor2priv>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:26:35 +0100
Message-ID:	<CAGYR9veYYcYnYaqDt-Qzp7StKb=Paz9+q8YnhEAnt4=tXQMWXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb alternatives
From:	Bernhard Kraft <bkraf0j9 AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I mostly use git from the commandline, it's open source, it's coded in
plain C (altough I do not have to do with git internals) ... I do not
see a reason against DVCS. But one likes emacs another one vim. There
is no reason for flamewar :)

I suggested git because there is github and we could easily start a
project there - everyone with not so much git-commandline experience
could also contribute. If there is a similar service for SVN I would
agree. If you are completely against a VCS (git, svn, csv, etc.) then
I see no way. Even the libraries on gedasymbols.org (which really is a
treasurebox) are managed via CVS:

http://www.gedasymbols.org/cvs.html

You just type three lines into the bash and get additional hundreds of
footprints and symbols ... If you configure PCB correctly you can even
browse and view through them.

I tought of combining the existing libraries and the gedasymbols.org
resource into a new structured library.

greets,
Bernhard


On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:28 AM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015, Bernhard Kraft wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:20 AM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>>
>>> I think, at some point, it's be a real major step forward if the standard
>>> lib could be separated from gschem and pcb into a standalone package.
>>
>>
>> I would say:
>> * Lets start a project at github.
>> * There we import the current structure from /usr/share/pcb
>> (debian/ubuntu) and create a subdirectory "structured".
>> * If someone wants to help out he/she can post suggestions/pull requests
>> * There we discuss and move (copy?) all components as required.
>> * Because we are in the world of open source we can just create our
>> own package and make it available at debian/ubuntu launchpad
>>
>> Are you familiar with git?
>
>
> Sorry, git is a show stopper for me - there is no way I can be talked into
> using it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor2
>

- Raw text -