delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
From: | Kai-Martin Knaak <knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Commonness of internal layer cutouts/cavities? |
Date: | Mon, 16 Feb 2015 22:05:50 +0100 |
Organization: | Institut =?UTF-8?B?ZsO8cg==?= Quantenoptik |
Lines: | 26 |
Message-ID: | <mbtlku$ggv$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <CAOFvGD7b1CvpHSoy+=n-dJHhc77Z5TngYb1LaL9Fp8Pgxh3qww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org |
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: | 130.75.103.107 |
User-Agent: | KNode/4.14.1 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t1GKwNu3031479 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Jason White wrote: > How common are cavities (that is internal cutouts on a PCB specific to > a single layer) in the electronics world? IMHO, this depends on what kind of electronics you do. Keep-out requirements are quite common with components that deal with triple digit MHz to GHz bandwidth, or Johnson noise limited performance. Outside this regime, I would not worry about tracks running under components. (But maybe I just don't have enough experience...) ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |