X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore:	I do not consent to surveillance, prick
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1423161343;
	bh=HveqoD5h2zOf3TchD1hDJJgPw3/FdZSJAvo7ymuLmsI=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=h9ovlW1bPa39az67bP1rMXTTBPYsYwfDmyAcLWLTieQJ7JZto5pesTCkn635Vwufm
	OKOCh3D0QxG9WBElnn5p81xXdqsiNA9oX1Wr5cmQ/60+gREHmeIFw0u+aqoPPGvKkL
	y1Icj4QrfaIk4nFO6j/UMFamO4qOQdAd8KCNGEuM=
Message-ID:	<54D3B7FF.7010401@neurotica.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:35:43 -0500
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
References:	<1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN5gs5r_on=HP2RN7cy6E=2EL9eK3cp+sd9BfBaWNLVew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <CAOFvGD4M48Ap=UQzL_T3yzas2rJrNFfxXRUOkOe8gA8J3bQCHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502050141070 DOT 24630 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <54D3B04A DOT 3080308 AT neurotica DOT com> <alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502051225450 DOT 11811 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.LNX.2.02.1502051225450.11811@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 02/05/2015 01:26 PM, mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca wrote:
>>   Lua is primarily (and almost exclusively) used in games and toys.
>> That has a few implications of its own.
> 
> Scheme is primarily not used at all.  Is that better?

  I think DJ made my point for me on this one.  Lisp being at the core
of emacs, AutoCAD, and at least one large commercial EDA package that
was mentioned in this thread, I think the argument for obscurity is a
crock of BS.

  However, even if it were "primarily not used at all", if I were in a
position to defend the use of gEDA vs. some commercial product, yes, it
would in fact be better.  "Lua?  Isn't that for childrens' toys?  See, I
told you that free stuff wasn't for real work."

  It's pretty clear that you simply don't like Scheme.  That's fine,
just keep it out of this thread.

               -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ/3
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -