X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore:	I do not consent to surveillance, prick
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1423159370;
	bh=VSICUk/Lk1/DV7S7+c31hGrBB2aDGuWgnwvkzUyxTqA=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=ZtLY3lW9GEUZ7BuLKVK26vrsFZ0ddQgShIc5Uq0DD6nSW7ZWh4VmyLdKM4+NfMZ6X
	ztvp3hsk5FTx6zgQsV5cOhL9wNHkp6X7C2qjDoHCMdWJ7y2ZhGZ9whSy8Y30C8Cc1o
	Aq6shB9m2oxK0OyktsM++17IZToM3RDxlzbZY5u0=
Message-ID:	<54D3B04A.3080308@neurotica.com>
Date:	Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:02:50 -0500
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
References:	<1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN5gs5r_on=HP2RN7cy6E=2EL9eK3cp+sd9BfBaWNLVew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <CAOFvGD4M48Ap=UQzL_T3yzas2rJrNFfxXRUOkOe8gA8J3bQCHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502050141070 DOT 24630 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.LNX.2.02.1502050141070.24630@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 02/05/2015 02:47 AM, mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca wrote:
>> Because of that, I recommend Lua (lua.org). A lightweight, embeddable
>> scripting language which is very popular in the video game industry.
> 
> I realize this isn't a vote, but I think Lua is probably the best choice,
> too.  Think about many years has GNU been trying to standardize Scheme as
> the one true scripting language for free software, how much traction it
> has ever gained, and why that might be.

  Lua is primarily (and almost exclusively) used in games and toys.
That has a few implications of its own.

              -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ/3
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -