X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 07:40:58 -0600 (CST)
From:	mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca
X-X-Sender:	mskala AT localhost DOT localdomain
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Footprint generation.... was: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1502050759100.55344@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
Message-ID:	<alpine.LNX.2.02.1502050729450.24630@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150204073758 DOT Horde DOT czAmF2JsXvWH254t3K1lrw2 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502040133260 DOT 5201 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <201502041241 DOT t14Cfd30005029 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAOuGh89YXTP2GN1gvPXm=iTYRF0eTxiTZfyU_-1Dx+ZmeM0jwQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT BSF DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1502041223340 DOT 7094 AT earl-grey DOT cloud9 DOT net>
	<alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502050414490 DOT 24630 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT BSF DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1502050759100 DOT 55344 AT earl-grey DOT cloud9 DOT net>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.02 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.74
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 5 Feb 2015, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> > important and valuable.  It seems a shame that gEDA once had that ability
> > and now basically doesn't.
>
> Also, the path most people take w.r.t. defining similar footprint sets
> is to use scripts or programs to generate families of footprint files
> all at once.  For example, John Luciani maintains a fabulous website
> containing lots of footprints he generated using Perl:

Yes, and I've got my own Perl scripts to automatically generate suites of
symbol files containing the attribute data that the FAQ says I shouldn't
want.  It appears that anyone who is using these tools, as I am, must
become a toolsmith to build the necessary features that aren't included.
We're all doing that for ourselves individually.

Aren't such scripts exactly the kind of "workflow automation" that people
are wishing, in this thread, gEDA would supply instead of forcing us all
to build for outselves?  Whether the scripts are run online, with their
output captured by pipes, or offline to generate files written to disk, is
not the point.  The point is that gEDA used to have a feature for this,
and it has been deprecated without a suitable, or any, replacement.  I
don't know a clearer description for such a situation than that gEDA has
taken a step backwards.

-- 
Matthew Skala
mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca                 People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/

- Raw text -