X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=S1e8NKsghlGF8XaSfWsf1neKRQ2DACS+Ii0Cdf0lSbY=;
	b=SRVlesD83/p1s0vhTkSzpj3jxwvgv/4BSAoxnicPvLxaMQ85ztkcuR9XiW6sqqVvlQ
	iDHuBdQmwCjF4+nFfz1anHir22eUHk0aBJ3mXUKGmW6SJGzOKdC5vT01Gy+/TA5MlXwl
	aHAlljS71k4OXSAMOZoe3Dt0XGU2zdW25mQVx9fJqTWgJZJS+fbSJS3GbnDTyVxiZatC
	SEJ8urr4tiq9SA091gHlr9vl6ALkY7D6ZD2+Is3SQDmAMCgRTxWq7ThLDNCV9ipLmndd
	ZmLU5Oo1dzCpils/4Q++xUfucTFAjPqHIERVg7dOUulRrT7obKe3iWeB0VlifxsqZnK0
	gJ9Q==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.107.46.213 with SMTP id u82mr35865084iou.68.1423062525501;
	Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:08:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<201502041241.t14Cfd30005029@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
	<20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl>
	<54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan>
	<20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150204073758 DOT Horde DOT czAmF2JsXvWH254t3K1lrw2 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1502040133260 DOT 5201 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201502041241 DOT t14Cfd30005029 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:08:45 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAOuGh89YXTP2GN1gvPXm=iTYRF0eTxiTZfyU_-1Dx+ZmeM0jwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
From:	Bob Paddock <graceindustries AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:41 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> By the way, why are m4 footprints deprecated in gEDA?  That looks like a
>> step backwards.
>
> Mostly, "not generally available on Windows"

Anyone capable of running gEDA on Windows is more than capable of installing
gnuwin32.  http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/  Has M4 and the other
needed 'missing' things like ls, which etc.

What I see on the list is people usually disable M4 because it
conflicts in odd ways with footprint files.
Which has noting to do with the operating system.

- Raw text -