X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<54CBC757.2080804@think-open.at>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:03:03 +0100
From:	Bernhard Kraft <kraftb AT think-open DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam_score:	-2.9
X-Spam_score_int:	-28
X-Spam_bar:	--
X-Spam_report:	Spam detection software, running on the system "think-open.at", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email. If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

 Content preview:  Hi, First I would like to say hello as this is my first post
    to this list. Until now I only contributed some gschem symbols to the geda
    project: http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/bernhard_kraft/ I have a question
    regarding a simple 2 layer board. Usually I etch prototypes at home so I
   already have some homebrew-design-rules like not placing a via under a SMD
    component, etc. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP            Message was received from an IP address
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: gedasymbols.org]
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 89.104.9.138
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kraftb AT think-open DOT at
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on think-open.at
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
	TVD_RCVD_IP,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
Subject: Connecting GND planes
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.think-open.at)

Hi,

First I would like to say hello as this is my first post to this list. 
Until now I only contributed some gschem symbols to the geda project:
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/bernhard_kraft/

I have a question regarding a simple 2 layer board. Usually I etch 
prototypes at home so I already have some homebrew-design-rules like not 
placing a via under a SMD component, etc.

To simplify describing the problem here is a picture of a part of a PCB:
http://picpaste.de/screen1-Bp7Roqnq.png

Ok. Looks like I am almost finished. Only one ratsnest to route. But if 
I route the remaining rat the following happens:
http://picpaste.de/screen2-ZR9DJ7G6.png

The new trace stopped the top-GND polygon (green) from flooding the area 
as it is (unintentionally) isolated by top-CU traces.

I already tried placing vias into the isolated areas, I tried it before 
and after isolating it with the last trace. I tried different thermals 
onto the via - no way.

Is this a bug? Should it get reported? Is the only workaround to 
manually draw additional polys and connect them with vias?


greetings,
Bernhard
-- 
Wer nicht gelegentlich auch einmal kausalwidrige Dinge zu denken vermag,
wird seine Wissenschaft nie um eine neue Idee bereichern können.
Max Planck (1858-1947)

- Raw text -