X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:27:16 +0100
From:	Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] HIDDEN PINS IN A SYMBOL
Message-ID:	<20150119112716.GB17436@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<CALSZ9gp08b7L5HMesdT3yX-di-0PsqqjRA0b0RKGbc4FtOm6rQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150117213351 DOT 106EE81A5EB7 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<CAOFvGD5+=KfJ=6m+96ASmDe9QZ1DeSiJoQAWXbBGww0H+3z85g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOxVtSS9FVpgh1eYdj4tSr8LVkdp0=H8VVgxVAM=tYCqaAQY5g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150117222659 DOT 0CE0581A5EB7 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhRapmzSh+g_ELuXnaQk-EwbmFwZQriV_Z_WEOE36Vm8Vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhRapmzSh+g_ELuXnaQk-EwbmFwZQriV_Z_WEOE36Vm8Vw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score:	-0.2 (/)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report:	Content analysis details: (-0.2 points)
	pts rule name description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
	0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.5101]
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:40:43AM -0500, Evan Foss wrote:
> I know it looks ugly but I always show all the pins. I feel it better
> reflects what the situation is more honestly.

It takes a lot of schematics real-estate, I typically use only a simple
diode and rename the pins in the package. I did this for a ZHCS2000, I
don't see any problem since PCB complains as long as it finds a single
non-connected pin, i.e, it wants all "1" and "2" pins to be connected.

    Regards,
    Gabriel

- Raw text -