delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sun, 18 Jan 2015 13:43:21 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <201501181843.t0IIhLfd016997@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <20150118110441.1a328bf1@aluminium.mobile.teply.info> (message |
from Florian Teply on Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:04:41 +0100) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] HIDDEN PINS IN A SYMBOL |
References: | <CALSZ9gp08b7L5HMesdT3yX-di-0PsqqjRA0b0RKGbc4FtOm6rQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAOFvGD5_is9FkcG_i5557_ejFHUqeyA3UhNNdP2-yXRrwk-PPg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150118110441 DOT 1a328bf1 AT aluminium DOT mobile DOT teply DOT info> | |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Slightly not directly related to symbols, but it always sstrikes me as > odd that some (actually most for that kind of part) manufacturers > decide to use four pins for the drain, but only one for the source > terminal. I always assumed the drain was on the bottom of the wafer, and that the extra pins were for heat dissipation... The OnSemi app note for their ChipFET line say: "The pin–out is similar to the TSOP–6 configuration, with two additional drain pins to enhance power dissipation and thermal performance." The ST smd app note says this about their SO-8 package: "Since the drain pins serve the additional function of providing the thermal connection to the package, . . ." See also: http://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/32511/why-so-many-pins-for-the-mosfets-drain
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |