X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Envelope-From:	paubert AT iram DOT es
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:48:30 +0100
From:	Gabriel Paubert <paubert AT iram DOT es>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Any good repository for datasheets in pdf out there?
Message-ID:	<20150114114830.GA24995@visitor2.iram.es>
References:	<CAGde_xMT+BXsS0iiTD4yz2On_nTpAD1VkyzkKVuGW4=gduOqdg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<54B57095 DOT 20000 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<CAGde_xMHch3jiGc=0TR-6aCnVhQ9GfJ+-ozGN2jMaBKwrdB8jQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAGde_xMHch3jiGc=0TR-6aCnVhQ9GfJ+-ozGN2jMaBKwrdB8jQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spamina-Bogosity:	Unsure
X-Spamina-Spam-Score:	-1.0 (-)
X-Spamina-Spam-Report:	Content analysis details: (-1.0 points)
	pts rule name description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
	-0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20%
	[score: 0.1951]
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 07:40:17AM +0100, Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
> On 13 January 2015 at 20:23, Girvin Herr <girvin DOT herr AT sbcglobal DOT net> wrote:
> 
> > I am not sure what kind of "metadata" you need to connect to a datasheet.
> > Creating a repository may be redundant and not worth the effort
> 
> 
> The most important metadata is our internal component code for production
> for the board. This  goes into the BOM to whoever produces the board. We
> also have the experience that we need to handle pdf locally as websites,
> companies and parts obsoletes.

I've just been bitten by another problem, changing specifications
without changing the part number nor anything else.

For some reason, I need to test a circuit down to liquid nitrogen
temperature, and I had decided to use Honeywell's HEL-705-U series
RTD (platinum temperature sensors, 1kohm at 0C). The temperature 
range was specified as -200C to 260C, they recently changed the
lower end of the temperature range to -70C. I have the old and
newer datasheets as a proof. Reducing the range of a temperature probe
by 130C without even touching the part number is unacceptable in my
eyes, I sent them an email (trying to be polite as my opinion on
their behaviour is not printable) but did not get any answer.

It's a mess, I had designed an enclosure with temperature sensing
points designed to accomodate the probe. I have a few probes bought
last year in stock but I need ~25 more to finish the project, and I
don't know whether new ones will work or not.

    Regards,
    Gabriel

- Raw text -