X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=i0OZw7+zQlIcuhTWmP1mtu+MJbfq2423nf7EPTM5l+w=;
	b=qfhgbyI3PvvYozbwVGgwxp1XGadOKFTCIrloYX7oMK//tXepyV240A+WgigALNfctU
	vonpQmVEeumXtZuVi8XJSXU0Ba+4Uk9aTs1VP/rzBW9A/kIXwap7I6+N1p1Vbs24UwF/
	oHg/lT60qoNQCXhHc9SRrYJR+4f0v/mBjcebqJmbvtf1eoXvKotfuepTkuz85ePxewa/
	+v0VDpMofVCiEC1w0Z3WlIg4FAXA2EHlKPKKopQF+fNe3J3oJGqbHRG/20bzjbreVEKt
	zmA4Zogw79vbDyPNaY4E5/BoGZ0hjaBJg6bN0HPSOYJKXfrjGTDqhjbj1xIuwb0fJEoy
	N1ag==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.28.227 with SMTP id e3mr18735275lah.54.1413689260754;
	Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAGde_xNdddUSnCyyvKGjMKVPfUaN4WejS816rt-2XFmD592MXw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAGRhJMZgn5YojUcGKR+nEj6bPWjKmff4ykg_adjKeB=89q+_gw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1CY7=enEfxmCn3dhr36=j_ytnSjfhYvHVC6-TV8AK=5w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGRhJMaFnS_PWZmKAio6DKBeWx0z57uV8XjnZKwb2WmkJVGCGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<00E6DEBC-05AB-4079-9E88-152225FF6DDE AT qux DOT com>
	<87wq80xauh DOT fsf AT hotmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL0WTYDc_UNmtQbencnx69t4u1X=HMDy1Y=7aM=EYW6-oA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<87siinykoy DOT fsf AT hotmail DOT com>
	<5440A6B2 DOT 2000900 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1410170815140 DOT 3358 AT igor2priv>
	<5441519D DOT 4060009 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRSE1J6493W+3t2tSoH9Mr2TddKg47vgrfxqU64xam+sw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5441B86D DOT 8000001 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTjY5cJ9DWuG5zb-Psb_sHaRjHPWn_kb_S43Na9x2reaQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<2B12B7BB-2B96-4A89-8779-423523B731BF AT qux DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRXNqQqV=eZyLvb_-ttOkv=1=sNGEgYnOOxKUwHQoUu_A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<D1C6B1F4-D009-465A-B3DF-E81055E83A93 AT qux DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQtVC2R3H-3ppzUTjNGKZpxKEdJNJ_QMzKycej1bDxWgA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGde_xNdddUSnCyyvKGjMKVPfUaN4WejS816rt-2XFmD592MXw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 18 Oct 2014 23:27:40 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTRczF845GH+mcvwRoyOJ1Cj8d2UBBueF3KD=4yP7ah4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] SchemeIt
From:	Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Well I think Roger and I are on the same page about diff. I like make
it does the job well. Sorry workflow was the wrong word. I was just
wondering if like diff there was something obvious missing in the
toolchain.

The for software we have diff, patch and etc. I am just wondering what
other tools we could create parity for and how that might work.

PS: Is anyone else going to the MIT Amateur Radio Flee tomorrow?




On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem
<svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com> wrote:
> On 18 October 2014 19:00, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> Using libgeda for gschdiff is more like what I was imagining.
>>
>> All this talk about version control and diff is making me wonder.
>> Visual diff is sweet and all but I feel like we are missing something
>> work flow wise.
>
>
> What do you have in mind on work flow? make does a good job gluing the
> command line tools together in my work flows.
>
> --
> Svenn



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -