X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=SFwDcPoB5vNsVsXIqtPNhtamFfPoKxxWBF2Ut6sJBn0=;
	b=poYQviPM1Wim0x0/ITBc2KUiNIT7CtcXsXrAzikP69o33ybzAUNaLjH+upnQq0rszd
	QGIyi3qNWSAEmZxUEbUYkdpJ8m6cB1N6sv2Fvmd8S8GPOLCnC8bn3Y/YqJYZ68ThBlOj
	a8FO0W3RB+BWoARiEmgL6W62bTzJ8nUETb1s2iFR9qT9JXvqTMPuqn7NZdXqg4VXBv+C
	9FQDohMAEgCGtYQmAa25mRZ4fDCtPCZIjGCF5+IFuFjRYm4HBpHaoYlY0DrJ59PZ4Q9s
	6HxuPpJSD51vrfzTE7C0j9XT/snrEFa6qNZCDkMvWWKcGzo8QV/TrhVw076grg6ow+6J
	yEjw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.107.28.203 with SMTP id c194mr4082108ioc.29.1413489603335;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.LNX.2.02.1410161429490.17137@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<CAGRhJMZgn5YojUcGKR+nEj6bPWjKmff4ykg_adjKeB=89q+_gw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL1CY7=enEfxmCn3dhr36=j_ytnSjfhYvHVC6-TV8AK=5w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGRhJMaFnS_PWZmKAio6DKBeWx0z57uV8XjnZKwb2WmkJVGCGQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<00E6DEBC-05AB-4079-9E88-152225FF6DDE AT qux DOT com>
	<87wq80xauh DOT fsf AT hotmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL0WTYDc_UNmtQbencnx69t4u1X=HMDy1Y=7aM=EYW6-oA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FE126892-4E96-44BD-949A-946E8519BAC3 AT qux DOT com>
	<alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1410161429490 DOT 17137 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:00:03 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c9cZ0yt1XxPrNcrwsJ=HyWBsJUejzRQDRCNwoTMksnRkA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] SchemeIt
From:	Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:32 AM,  <mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Roger Williams wrote:
>> Now, what upverter does offer is a very large component library and handy
>> graphical tools to simplify footprint and symbol creation, and tight
>> integration between the schematic capture and PCB layout tools.
>
> Not having libraries that really work and that cover the components we're
> using, is a much bigger impediment to collaborative design than not having
> application-specific source control integration.

Agreed.  The huge weakness gEDA has is the total lack of any agreed upon
way of reusing component descriptions and subcircuits.  Everyone has their
own private way of doing it.

A short while ago someone came up with IIRC a way to roll component libraries
into sch files.  This is a step in the right direction.  Has anyone gotten
around to trying this?

I meant to try it but haven't done so, and as usual I'm not sure where the
code for it ended up.

Britton

- Raw text -