X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seznam.cz; s=beta;
	t=1407754711; bh=6oDhs8+6s38RAp9Dy+h9cweXj8SyWlKVHAO4C0GGgVg=;
	h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:References:Mime-Version:
	X-Mailer:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=Q6RNDIg9ld6oCpBbzb8U403k6gAbeuRakgP8HW9rn1QMCQHMmblcUzZaTls0jLCo/
	09e/c6WVglfIIGmKCcuv5JjdCzQrOXucJR5IFPFMLN6gnwpcEJRXQAVH5s8If/QLbp
	II78V+TukRNnhdf1ZcGiRrhZEC0Y6coK2fc+1OQM=
From:	"Vaclav Peroutka" <vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz>
To:	<geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] How smart is gschems 1.9.1 rubberbanding?
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:58:30 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id:	<EfD.Jaia.7sV{}1lrwnK.1JwA7M@seznam.cz>
References:	<1407607347 DOT 2887 DOT 13 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
	<53E67CAE DOT 3050601 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<ls6ccg$bbf$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0 (szn-mime-1.1.14)
X-Mailer:	szn-ebox-4.4.206
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:

> I wouldn't mind a special mode for a single net. The big advantage of 
> rubberband comes with moves that involve many nets.

In work, I started to draw schematics in Zuken and it is more intuitive for 
me. Look at this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmIQyC9pbJQ

I would love to see such behaviour in gschem, too.

Vaclav

- Raw text -