delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
From: | Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] How smart is gschems 1.9.1 rubberbanding? |
Date: | Sun, 10 Aug 2014 01:54:55 +0200 |
Lines: | 10 |
Message-ID: | <ls6ccg$bbf$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <1407607347 DOT 2887 DOT 13 DOT camel AT AMD64X2> <53E67CAE DOT 3050601 AT ecosensory DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org |
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: | a89-182-148-184.net-htp.de |
User-Agent: | KNode/4.12.4 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
John Griessen wrote: > A one net at a time tool could be just a mode with mouse actions: > click-drag to convert a diagonal to rectilinear and influence where > right angle points are. I wouldn't mind a special mode for a single net. The big advantage of rubberband comes with moves that involve many nets. ---<)kaimartin(>---
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |