delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references | |
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to | |
:user-agent; | |
bh=TCo5M4vScRbE4X7xWCqu6czaX0CChl14LwZe+IZCAA0=; | |
b=BH+CYM4MAXACdpIdIdsYwZLZwm5FmZJN6QQoUeljudChAwUcFKpuw6ggybynSVRPj5 | |
uXATHt+o0NoP0BhvVnY1/o/F1G9+9fvZdNV7/N9dIRQK8+tXrPwVGclhB49fwzIbl0cn | |
pFCklka3XwnQueBx5psS0jWTVlBTma7NXE4iB0olVruxUgAXNairIFh+poVv2tAF8BPB | |
XzR2fWGUILpTCFyNqkVkGki4Nqd9824OpJXTL5T+9GXe6nvSBKPM7xIuYJmeW31f4KIv | |
2G1UUVIU012tc+EERvn7GqTSURlKpAGyOXxe745GFMGwsBBLAqA2B0SNcthynNDWGMu9 | |
uFhQ== | |
X-Received: | by 10.152.43.65 with SMTP id u1mr1271076lal.5.1407215517472; |
Mon, 04 Aug 2014 22:11:57 -0700 (PDT) | |
Date: | Tue, 5 Aug 2014 09:11:54 +0400 |
From: | Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Pin Type Dialog |
Message-ID: | <20140805051154.GB22564@localhost.localdomain> |
Mail-Followup-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <399B159D-C237-45F0-947B-90C91E30C7DD AT sbcglobal DOT net> |
<20140804105713 DOT GH24580 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
<F8F84CB2-551D-4D4D-A544-56986B1442CF AT sbcglobal DOT net> | |
<20140804183141 DOT GA11585 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
<75BE262E-75FC-40E5-9A49-B5EFD4F370CA AT sbcglobal DOT net> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <75BE262E-75FC-40E5-9A49-B5EFD4F370CA@sbcglobal.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:50:33PM -0700, Edward Hennessy wrote: ... > I think the pin types need to be exposed in a consistent GUI format, > until the functionality is changed (or removed) in the future. Agreed. > The new dialogs provide expander widgets to hide sections. I can look > at using the mechanism that stores dialog locations to also store the > preference to keep sections hidden for the users that don't need them. > This way, the for the users that don't need the pin type, it will > remain hidden. This would be nice.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |