delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
From: | Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Pin Type Dialog |
Date: | Tue, 05 Aug 2014 06:09:57 +0200 |
Lines: | 37 |
Message-ID: | <lrplem$beb$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <399B159D-C237-45F0-947B-90C91E30C7DD AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20140804105713 DOT GH24580 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <F8F84CB2-551D-4D4D-A544-56986B1442CF AT sbcglobal DOT net> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org |
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: | a89-182-75-156.net-htp.de |
User-Agent: | KNode/4.12.4 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Edward Hennessy wrote: > Non-modal dialogs can be left open during the entire session while > editing schematics. ack. Modal dialogs are considered inferior UI style since at least the start of the century. Along the same lines, "apply" buttons are discouraged. See for example the Gnome2 Human Interface Guidelines (HIG). https://developer.gnome.org/hig-book/stable/ > I believe the issue becomes the number of > mon-modal dialogs open at the same time, and the inconvenience for > the user to arrange/manage them. That's why most drawing applications use dedicated areas rather than separate dialogs these days. > Is there a another dialog that it could be merged into? Yes: * the "Single_Attribute_Editor" and the "Edit_Attributes" dialog * the "Edit_Text_Properties", the "Edit_Line_Width&Type", the "Colour_Edit" and the "Edit_Fill_Type" dialog should be merged into a generalized properties dialog. * "Find Specific Text", "Show Specific Text", "Hide_Specific_Text" While at it, the "Text_Entry" dialog should be replaced by in-place editing. ---<)kaimartin(>---
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |