X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=A3QZiyNms6xhvISEdcKLleq3Xx80SZf51Z3bO2m3r2o=;
	b=iygeqzPcBK5/+954zJxQ0EOVFCVZA1cspUSAas0eqBzd5ofddtNsG/i6ZUPcafZU70
	sfh/1CacKqKL1Z0uru9NlF35uc4OP2Gzx97tfG7Y6k16jFHf23p1i4kqXkN1tRYfyKnC
	V/zDIddhJ563MKvu6HlwKGIXt6xm/Qw37wd3103fbxcckVs4xjq6OKAwkJTkisEaM16q
	hgnJ5ybgN316FE/EBkPvM2iIBCucBruREauLzVZD2ztpMCo65pldANE4tfPR1w5FldUY
	RdQoO0aJ8xALDWs1XvA2geS1EzryieICk5YHg9VpafccrU2BIUf1jWQdJQeswZjrS+qN
	1wTw==
X-Received:	by 10.152.29.137 with SMTP id k9mr22485204lah.27.1407149856119;
	Mon, 04 Aug 2014 03:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 4 Aug 2014 14:57:13 +0400
From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Pin Type Dialog
Message-ID:	<20140804105713.GH24580@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<399B159D-C237-45F0-947B-90C91E30C7DD AT sbcglobal DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<399B159D-C237-45F0-947B-90C91E30C7DD@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 08:06:26PM -0700, Edward Hennessy wrote:
> All,
> 
> When converting the pin type dialog into a non-modal and
> instant-apply, it doesn't seem like a single setting should be
> in a dialog box by itself.
Why not?

> Should it be merged into the
> color/line type/fill type dialog? If not, what should it be
> merged with?
I think no. I see no reason to merge pin settings with anything
else. Pins have no properties appropriate to other primitives and
vice versa.

- Raw text -