X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=ioO1CXgL/ySAbEVhuce9hw3BXNLGGcNJpPOg2xFktCo=;
	b=FzxPnXYy4vSCRulul5qmpqdU8BliZ0rLHO3xkxTtr7d0MI0kDT4VsFkwOjmzIDfoUM
	li7gVypDwfLgkVgbcGPdahXzfmGlwGWiiueT/j0c4UG9x7YhJuq/UfoOFSl/rxdCkaBq
	OZxOeskSjrRadkV12xCxvTBKHYlHdi5VpKD4RlhQj5Et8GgI84tZCVYoALXPDNI/f2sC
	Fol+KltaUh32RFFLRaaOHvLoXghmrC5fY1JAzxuHI6EBQIWGTyTrvEHh9a3u6wGXaI+W
	/JzpoVcUR4IWTuYsPROmsi6nNsZJgZOEq5TtbTIlVhWLqrLJWlLZhurzhGVItmA0awZT
	G11g==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.49.44 with SMTP id r12mr12902751ign.41.1397758793307;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<lip58l$is5$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<1395878918 DOT 2126 DOT 7 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	<53477BD5 DOT 3070001 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<1397238146 DOT 861 DOT 11 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	<201404111621 DOT 02147 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
	<534BED69 DOT 4050703 AT estechnical DOT co DOT uk>
	<534C1B44 DOT 20401 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<20140417000357 DOT 21967 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<201404170012 DOT s3H0C0SU021800 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20140417010616 DOT 26473 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<201404170117 DOT s3H1HgR6027052 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20140417025146 DOT 1321 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<lip58l$is5$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:19:53 -0700
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_5DDcmE59ZAA_MiSrvUZj2FVTOfih_xvYyMcfG-nY1xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Freerouting finally free (GPL3)
From:	Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
<knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
> Peter Stuge wrote:
>
>> It's a great example of a feature branch, and maintaining it in a
>> branch somewhere outside of the primary repo allows more freedom in
>> the development.
>>
>> It becomes unneccessary to constantly synchronize with whatever else
>> is going on, and development of the new feature can include wild
>> experiments across the codebase which aren't neccessarily desirable
>> in the primary repo just because they are part of the process for
>> creating the new feature.
>
> This worked well with Peter Cliftons development of openGL rendering and
> better polygon support (Thank you again, Peter!).
>
> His branch also shows the potential problems of such an almost forked
> approach. More often than not life outside open source development demands
> more priority. The tedious work to make changes compatible with the main
> branch may be postponed until forever. There were some desirable features
> in Peters branches that got lost in the process. E.g. solder mask used to
> be cut by the outline of the board in one of his branches. And of course,
> the impressive speed-up I saw with one of his more "aggressive" branches.

As another example, the vim scripts pages are now largely dead, and instead
we have 10+ forks for each popular script with exactly one bug fix in each.

I feel a bit bad since this discussions seems somewhat like a backhanded
way to try to get more integration work out of Peter.

Britton

- Raw text -