delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on fly.srk.fer.hr |
X-Spam-Level: | |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-1.0 required=6.3 tests=ALL_TRUSTED |
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 | |
Date: | Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:08:39 +0200 |
From: | Ivan Stankovic <pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] New web based pcb system |
Message-ID: | <20140409190839.GA13423@alpha2> |
References: | <CAOP4iL0YNQqC9NUSzQsr8csRrdETr=FrLg7Jy-KKTZUtOv71VQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<534566AC DOT 808 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
<CAHeNMgQADAo6shcrm2KdZvzhBDqDMvV4z9RR6KyEesr=KypF8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<DUB125-W47B3FE9531A1A53A69A89DC66A0 AT phx DOT gbl> | |
<CAC4O8c9GjiBWwXN4iu+-BZw5fpSLziG0rrdstpLH50GjtQKd3Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAC4O8c9GjiBWwXN4iu+-BZw5fpSLziG0rrdstpLH50GjtQKd3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
X-Operating-System: | GNU/Linux |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 09:47:53AM -0700, Britton Kerin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Hannu Vuolasaho <vuokko AT msn DOT com> wrote: > > I don't think web based EDA tools are bad thing. As long as you don't count on them too much. I think for web forums and other online collabration something like this > > > > http://www.plantuml.com:80/plantuml/png/TOwz3e8m58LtdkBi19bOI9J1nEZGZHSevSOsfRr2Bo6ylIYEE9mpVUT7KUXeGd71ZQSveCQT5_IC1uBsX85wT8EBdgOcsv5YWzKUgt7b6Cd8bnD6LLMP-b-vcLWjXqsjTGcBNc55Ngakotus_gCddmo7iXdFsqZ-EvCdOobeSIOT3BPMHu-LvpS0 > > > > would be a great tool to have for collabration if the URL would give schematics. (PlantUML doesn't do that.) Anyone who has tried to explain ciruit without schematics knows it is hard. > > > > If gschem had an autorouter and some basic components and djboxsym and some magic..... Well. Too difficult task for me at least. > > > > But I found easyeda.com hard to use. Maybe I'm spoiled with the luxury of gEDA and PCB :) > > Its better than the others (upverter, autodesk). I don't know if any of > these projects are using non-opaque formats yet but if they are I'd love to > share their parts. I know that upverter at least uses an open format based on JSON, it's even reasonably well documented. -- Ivan Stankovic, pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |