delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20140330124349.8644.qmail@stuge.se> |
Date: | Sun, 30 Mar 2014 14:43:49 +0200 |
From: | Peter Stuge <peter AT stuge DOT se> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Wav to C array ~ 16 bit to 12 bit |
Mail-Followup-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <CALSZ9gpoxnz9V-CbisKqmdwQyTtVf6G9nCe2Wt=4p4su-afFBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <5336E080 DOT 5080600 AT buffalo DOT edu> <533721CC DOT 9000408 AT buffalo DOT edu> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <533721CC.9000408@buffalo.edu> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Stephen R. Besch wrote: > now I think that the best technique is to formally rescale the data If you're going to do this often then a fixed point integer division will get you very close to the same results with only a fraction of the computation needed. //Peter
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |