X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=/bJ5o8Cm3APVP0UuFfIbYvF94ykkkkXpNCcqQqDhhjs=;
	b=TaGREvzGqJBROLQYkWDvWDfqmvGfDD3fjQG5PpFpAOHrSkcDAIKQKMb0fZzQJDvYUO
	4JR+BxtZ6vlB9eV9TyCKg1apVk58AUg+tTPncnlMnc+laaQEWDXzmS6jWtDfiaGHtYwL
	XHAlqvNWdBxazeFamdGepxI7PKVg5SkddJELTgn+oCcRqUmqCNpLquuCs88xtVy9pTBj
	sHuyBDnV/ov6g61JPyRdaRCHb2if55TgoodcwHolCsy2jq5UAmxCrAHwv+m3ldVsPNjR
	YlO8BnE4UxYs7TdNm8tIyYr2YY5UxxXYNXHRoUvfpaosEhHhs7vdHql9sMXF5LujhuSF
	Iw4A==
X-Received:	by 10.112.221.227 with SMTP id qh3mr713900lbc.55.1395144720014;
	Tue, 18 Mar 2014 05:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:11:57 +0400
From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb-20140316 is released
Message-ID:	<20140318121157.GB24197@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<201403170355 DOT s2H3tavv007601 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<532741F8 DOT 8090101 AT buffalo DOT edu>
	<201403171845 DOT s2HIj1kj012076 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20140317185419 DOT GB5081 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201403171856 DOT s2HIuDTJ012716 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20140317191258 DOT GC5081 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201403171921 DOT s2HJLmgp014261 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201403171921.s2HJLmgp014261@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 03:21:48PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > > I think the next major version bump will be 4.0, to avoid conflict
> > > with the TCL/TK version that claims it's 3.0.
> > 
> > Then let's wait for 1.299z ... I'm afraid somebody may release 4.0
> > and 5.0 meantime :)
> 
> the TCL/3.0 version has been out for a long time, so there's no
> "meantime" involved.  We just haven't had a good reason to make a
> major version number bump yet.

I was kidding, probably I haven't used correct tenses for English verbs
here, don't judge me so severely ;)

Seriously, what changes do you consider important enough to bump
the version? Will mil->um changes do? As for me, the versioning scheme
major.minor would be better and would allow to make minor fixes into
distributions more quickly.

- Raw text -