X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=WnCu2VHzYDR42tF079Vi0YJkPf3Aspci8B+JVePMoP8=;
	b=Pm1qtMQLV+a3UrDDAhyWJa3IrN1gcc07DQzIeci2lASfr0XUokHbkQxjlduJiPKR/M
	tD1HvCf0UTBY4o85WBcLVHCQpLbr65G+DBRjCVyws5HGVDpULcVIiWOrI221GN266yhn
	amGzrXcfgWvUDmwPeXtI5Oh1Hgeugm5JsFcp6qCnB7GTL8CpbKEb5/Mjc5UgvNa8MbeV
	f0Vs9n+vLtcExVkeeGKZ4XcZRc9GAJFWtiCdTp61EvtiSV+EVSj1niWzuyLliIYWjAX1
	n6n1MMw8hlNnXClzl5SWVyPls/DjmV2fiTVBvUcXTwxAN0fk5qZUjMHm6yek1ECM5HM3
	CraA==
X-Received:	by 10.112.27.176 with SMTP id u16mr4576107lbg.81.1393003135035;
	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:18:55 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:18:51 +0400
From:	Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0?
Message-ID:	<20140221171851.GB3599@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAOkiwat+o+GRSRmv4pqYPvuqwEeXa_+A1esiX_DToDcTLsKKZg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5305190D DOT 3020507 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<3Q3 DOT JW8u DOT 3zIDACCYyBi DOT 1J1RgG AT seznam DOT cz>
	<20140220154313 DOT GA28382 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<5wu.JWAu.4}M7a1xMt58 DOT 1J1oRu AT seznam DOT cz>
	<20140221115505 DOT GA25030 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAGRhJMbHj8kcUAkBzFr2G_UnBFBVtjmPq-PofARo-+GcGf-aLg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAGRhJMbHj8kcUAkBzFr2G_UnBFBVtjmPq-PofARo-+GcGf-aLg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 07:32:30AM -0500, Joshua Lansford wrote:
>    On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov
>    <[1]vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> 
>      There are many questions and corner cases. What should the program
>      do with multipin symbols, where to break nets and change their
>      direction. This depends on where and how the nets are connected or
>      unconnected and how tight the schematic is.
> 
>    Ha.  I remembered not to top post. :-)
:)

>    Here is a senior design project I worked on
>    that maintains orthogonal nets.  Test it to see how it handles the
>    boundary cases.
>    [2]http://sourceforge.net/projects/cedarlogic/
Thanks for the pointer.
I hope I'll have some more time some day to look at it.

- Raw text -