X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
	bh=5mEj0+o60ClUu/K79HEoKlYOXYQvQfrPU3vyvjbF+fc=;
	b=NQ1ZEQ+E24DLt01Y+ldKkPsDT7lfF/31/26fdPtJk3Vbpu8rEQXHHE0pWT4l5TN8R7
	h3fiWtApln27ik75PIDz1a++ixqY93H3uiXkwkQjjOVd/tr/GZ52nSn5QAwLX7JZMloK
	a91yBOqZ7v4ffdqyA6C4f1+hlr7zFmP0Ui9EexxnHbptszjzzXe1H1X8zlSItPzZsbT8
	EmANvg0eMboBJ/lao0nYFSTYSO14/wGyi0uhTdJjPfqS0R4djcf/DQPxDDIqhilufIAo
	1/eZ4tWyqT7TKijrVVxQBqjGb441UXvJmAr3utXoC1Cg2rLh1sO/c9gsHH+wTmOu1M4J
	CPRA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQlpmQyKGUVPAOfErGjwL500DAKWKnwLwhv3HcjmO0OjlZhdvHz5OBcUk6Z3P1rOovBgXpWR
X-Received:	by 10.180.100.70 with SMTP id ew6mr2140184wib.57.1392898681605;
	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 04:18:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3Q3.JW8u.3zIDACCYyBi.1J1RgG@seznam.cz>
References:	<CAOkiwat+o+GRSRmv4pqYPvuqwEeXa_+A1esiX_DToDcTLsKKZg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5305190D DOT 3020507 AT ecosensory DOT com> <3Q3 DOT JW8u DOT 3zIDACCYyBi DOT 1J1RgG AT seznam DOT cz>
From:	Joshua Lansford <joshua DOT lansford AT laserlinc DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:17:41 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAGRhJMbyMcs5Z5CpuQDQ43PS85Nig0YPzbTXQ0+Vvu=p24i1Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] How unstable is gEDA/gaf 1.9.0?
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--f46d044304b020209b04f2d57fa2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

gaf really made printing of multiple pages a whole lot easier for me.
~Joshua


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Vaclav Peroutka <vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> is there some "release notes" document with fixed bugs and new features ?
> I could not find it on geda-project.org
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Vaclav
>
> Od: John Griessen <john@>
>
> On 02/19/2014 11:52 AM, JAMES HARIG wrote:
> > How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0? Are people using it? The geda/gaf
> documentation references utilities (for example 'gaf'),
> > which are not in the 1.8 release. Is there a real benefit to using the
> newer version?
>
> Sure. It has the most bugs fixed. I always update before starting a new
> project.
> There's little risk of something broken badly in the latest code.
>
>

--f46d044304b020209b04f2d57fa2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">gaf really made printing of multiple pages a whole lot eas=
ier for me.<div style>~Joshua</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br=
><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Vaclav Peroutk=
a <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz" target=3D"_bl=
ank">vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Hello,<br><br>is there some &quot;relea=
se notes&quot; document with fixed=20
bugs and new features ? I could not find it on <a href=3D"http://geda-proje=
ct.org" target=3D"_blank">geda-project.org</a><br><br>Thanks=20
in advance,<br>Vaclav<br><br><p>Od: John Griessen=20
&lt;john@&gt;<br></p><div><div class=3D"h5"><br><blockquote>On 02/19/2014 1=
1:52 AM, JAMES HARIG=20
wrote:<br>&gt; How unstable is the gEDA/gaf 1.9.0?  Are people using it?  T=
he=20
geda/gaf documentation references utilities (for example &#39;gaf&#39;),<br=
>&gt; which
 are not in the 1.8 release.  Is there a real benefit to using the newer=20
version?<br><br>Sure.  It has the most bugs fixed.  I always update before=
=20
starting a new project.<br>There&#39;s little risk of something broken badl=
y in=20
the latest code.</blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div=
>

--f46d044304b020209b04f2d57fa2--

- Raw text -