X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Yandex-Uniq:	6501b5c6-2343-4d5b-86bd-1b202e40a2e2
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1387935132;
	bh=+VfwUfdjMhcZvUrXqGTwzHxZog5mQtbbstz7aVzHUpk=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:
	MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=OBnYEca2Nym4IHP25LxTHTFOLFJ+XkLj97vUsBLFouKAyeWO/tQYL6hP2C7RKLO4k
	9cR0TC0KibhkDNTR59AIb4CI8r52ZMGqVMFGgkNWmypf6+rrQ7nqYq4vsHPD898hs8
	MnBFRAK9kxnl2SoO9MIvkx6FER+5WHlWD1Ow8trU=
Authentication-Results:	smtp18.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru
Date:	Wed, 25 Dec 2013 07:32:08 +0600
From:	Alexey Shaposhnikov <canisdirusleidy AT yandex DOT ru>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [PATCH] Customizable graphical elements
Message-ID:	<20131225073208.72bd1ae8@warrawoona.sti>
In-Reply-To:	<20131222124920.GA5820@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<20131213050140 DOT 4ae1f52c AT warrawoona DOT sti>
	<20131221143249 DOT GA31097 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<20131222010634 DOT 2e9d5ba8 AT warrawoona DOT sti>
	<20131222124920 DOT GA5820 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id rBP1WKsZ007854
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:49:21 +0400
Vladimir Zhbanov <vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

> It seems to me a cue in the connection point lets the user see
> during schematic capture that the bus connection exists in the
> point.

Then it's already broken from, at least, version 1.62:
http://i.imgur.com/GLJZamZ.png (How to reproduce: 1. Draw single bus with
90-degree turn; 2. Draw another bus and connect it to the turning point of
first bus). And nobody cares about this.

> > I think in a similar way, but there is a small problem: can't come up how to
> > send these values to libgeda and libgedacairo functions. Now I see two
> > possible ways: add argument to o_..._new and cue drawing function or add
> > new properties for TOPLEVEL and EdaRenderer objects. And I dislike them
> > both (due to obvious API changing).
> 
> What's wrong with API changing? Can it break your workflow? :)

No, something much worse: required volume of work. Especially because now
(is I can see from sources) there is no "official" way to parse new config files
at startup instead of rereading at every movement.

-- 
С уважением, Алексей Шапошников.

- Raw text -