Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/09/24/14:15:09
--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Vladimir Zhbanov writes:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:47:37AM +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>> Peter TB Brett writes:
>>=20
>> > Generally we try and run about 2 years behind our dependencies, so 1.9=
.1
>> > will probably have an increment of required GTK+ version. 2.24.0 would
>> > *probably* be the next version required (released 2013-01-30).
>>=20
>> Oops. I mean, released on 2011-01-30, obviously...!
>
> Anyway, despite of the fact that gtk 2.24 is marked obsolete on the
> Gnome development site, I still can build geda-gaf with 2.20 using
> Sergey's patch (and that's fine!). For testers, it would be nice to
> have apparently noticed versions of libraries, required
> for the next release, rather than look around what's going wrong.
Yes, you were quite right to report this use of an API incompatible with
what was advertised as the requirements, because it was a bug and needed
fixing.
I just wanted to warn that an increment in dependencies was likely to
happen at some point fairly soon. :-)
Peter
=2D-=20
Dr Peter Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk>
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlJB1lsACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpoF8ACcC64ur6Yu6dd8lPFQlGeU16st
53sAnjNT9kmzMmjUBeTrM+YAczxit+gJ
=/J7w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
- Raw text -