delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
From: | Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] request for clarification: via names vs pin names (pcb) |
Date: | Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:22:11 +0200 |
Lines: | 28 |
Message-ID: | <l1kkkg$v3f$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <5236BA86 DOT 2070306 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <201309160814 DOT r8G8EONW004255 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org |
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: | a89-182-171-176.net-htp.de |
User-Agent: | KNode/4.10.5 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I can see the use of editing the pin and pad names, but what is the >> use of editing the via and line names? > > So when you're creating a footprint you can give pins and pads names > before you merge them into the footprint. Ack. I make use of this in my work-flow for footpint generation. Along the same lines I miss the ability to attach names to rectangles. Since a few versions of pcb pads also turn into pads on conversion to a footprint. They are much more intuitive than pads derived from lines. - ---<)kaimartin(>--- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlI91cMACgkQt9RkiGwLn1N5JACgrQ+8k3ll0SGYsdF5WzPxX4mI JAIAnRz3sFJ+MKrZ6T2Wi9d+uSVGZom0 =9qkT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |