delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
From: | Kevin Redon <ml AT mail DOT tsaitgaist DOT info> |
To: | geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] square clearance |
In-reply-to: | <201309181724.r8IHOwHP007496@envy.delorie.com> |
References: | <1379435002-sup-1363 AT dennou> <201309171649 DOT r8HGn174009713 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1379488984-sup-7784 AT dennou> <201309181724 DOT r8IHOwHP007496 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:38:39 +0200 |
Message-Id: | <1379575901-sup-9482@dennou> |
User-Agent: | Sup/0.14.1 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r8J7d6ut007831 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Excerpts from DJ Delorie's message of 2013-09-18 19:24:58 +0200: > > > Aren't square clearances manufacturable? > > http://www.delorie.com/pcb/notches.html > > In general, sharp corners, inside or outside, are less preferred than > rounded transitions, manufacturability-wise. that makes total sense. the proper solution might be to allow polygons and holes (or add elementpolygon), but that seems to be quite a hard task http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Feb-2007/msg00061.html
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |