delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject | |
:from:to:content-type; | |
bh=8DjwS635HTJ7OLorb+D08K7vCetIlxLQbFRgJyeZxNU=; | |
b=cAOx3uRLBzriBydM1XFWE0Y3ka/nXOLYoILbFalXAHxoxQnxvOavo6Lt/AfFfaV1Pp | |
fVcdR6usVmVByCjCqRMArvk/leTEDbjxq6HGJIjY7PpPn6s6QYiuqUrRP90dKmGAzf2p | |
eEUbeZDEfQ+UuCeDPpLliXGkMWgruXSkw2+PWq17Ep3nQV18AniC1fjBvQAnvnWroQW/ | |
NEttm/mZhOH5DA0RX1yIK4jm+VTLG+ittPIRP6XZ+5OxxK1wonm7k0VgWWx2YBu/ekA4 | |
PsIw2oRD201v+Sj5i3n1tM2Ki11Y7Gi5nl+rGXzwKaAaa5FrDX1k8BDCyddCdiUuvs84 | |
VR/g== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.220.186.202 with SMTP id ct10mr26448868vcb.14.1379321505768; |
Mon, 16 Sep 2013 01:51:45 -0700 (PDT) | |
Sender: | silicon DOT on DOT inspiration AT gmail DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <5236BA86.2070306@envinsci.co.uk> |
References: | <5236BA86 DOT 2070306 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:51:45 +1000 |
X-Google-Sender-Auth: | a0Dw5-74rl64AbAKOZZIME8pf9k |
Message-ID: | <CAKakQcenx0_q4xOg0Y5BVMaVBUH7FeYWqvY=8Bi55pGhqNcAnA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] request for clarification: via names vs pin names (pcb) |
From: | Stephen Ecob <stephen DOT ecob AT sioi DOT com DOT au> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--047d7b676fd061ed9a04e67c507c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Matt Rhys-Roberts < matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> wrote: > I've noticed that when working with buffer elements which have been broken > into pieces, it is possible to edit the via names (if through-hole) or line > names (if SMT). > > Conversely, when working with unbroken elements, it is possible to edit > the names of pin names (if through-hole) or pad names (if SMT). > > Yes, press 'n' whilst hovering over a pin or pad to edit its name. --047d7b676fd061ed9a04e67c507c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">= On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Matt Rhys-Roberts <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a= href=3D"mailto:matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk" target=3D"_blank">matt.rh= ys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p= x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I've noticed that when working with buff= er elements which have been broken into pieces, it is possible to edit the = via names (if through-hole) or line names (if SMT).<br> <br> Conversely, when working with unbroken elements, it is possible to edit the= names of pin names (if through-hole) or pad names (if SMT).<br> <br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Yes, press 'n' whilst ho= vering over a pin or pad to edit its name.</div><div><br></div></div> </div></div> --047d7b676fd061ed9a04e67c507c--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |