X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<5236BA86.2070306@envinsci.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 16 Sep 2013 09:00:06 +0100
From:	Matt Rhys-Roberts <matt DOT rhys-roberts AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
Organization:	Envin Scientific Ltd.
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] request for clarification: via names vs pin names (pcb)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

I've noticed that when working with buffer elements which have been 
broken into pieces, it is possible to edit the via names (if 
through-hole) or line names (if SMT).

Conversely, when working with unbroken elements, it is possible to edit 
the names of pin names (if through-hole) or pad names (if SMT).

I can see the use of editing the pin and pad names, but what is the use 
of editing the via and line names?

At the moment I'm making via/pin names the same, and line/pad names the 
same; everything seems to work ok.

Thanks, Matt.

- Raw text -