X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Cam-AntiVirus:	no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo:	http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Message-ID:	<1379037336.25012.3.camel@pcjc2lap>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB: why does pin name lettering appear on top &
	bottom copper Gerber output?
From:	Peter Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:55:36 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<201309101628.r8AGSkcs017932@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<522EF85C DOT 1000206 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
	<CAKakQcfsHrVYy8W8veg-W1sdCi7oBLww-Dqbc3XF+bDnqGAy_A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201309101628 DOT r8AGSkcs017932 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 12:28 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > AFAIK this is a feature, not a bug.
> 
> I think it's more of a bug

Definately a bug IMO.

> , but one that's hard to fix with the HID
> api we have now.  What we need is CAM jobs that describe which drawing
> layers become which output layers, so that things that make sense in a
> PDF but don't make sense in a gerber, can be properly filtered.

The GL code requires things a little differently, I just need to find
time to finish re-factoring it all..

(It might help this case too).

> What we actually have is a single "gui vs not-gui" flag that mostly
> works but is very simple, so the user needs to be aware which parts of
> the design are WYSIWYG and what parts are GUI-only.  Perhaps we should
> change pin names to be gui-only to avoid costly problems (and yes, I
> know no change will be universally liked ;)
> 
> FYI: generating gerbers in a Makefile is much more reliable anyway :-)

-- 
Peter Clifton <peter DOT clifton AT clifton-electronics DOT co DOT uk>

Clifton Electronics

- Raw text -