X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<522F4D12.9060303@sonic.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:47:14 -0700
From:	Dave Curtis <davecurtis AT sonic DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB: why does pin name lettering appear on top &
	bottom copper Gerber output?
References:	<522EF85C DOT 1000206 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <CAKakQcfsHrVYy8W8veg-W1sdCi7oBLww-Dqbc3XF+bDnqGAy_A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201309101628 DOT r8AGSkcs017932 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201309101628.r8AGSkcs017932@envy.delorie.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 09/10/2013 09:28 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> AFAIK this is a feature, not a bug.
> I think it's more of a bug, but one that's hard to fix with the HID
> api we have now.  What we need is CAM jobs that describe which drawing
> layers become which output layers, so that things that make sense in a
> PDF but don't make sense in a gerber, can be properly filtered.
>
> What we actually have is a single "gui vs not-gui" flag that mostly
> works but is very simple, so the user needs to be aware which parts of
> the design are WYSIWYG and what parts are GUI-only.  Perhaps we should
> change pin names to be gui-only to avoid costly problems (and yes, I
> know no change will be universally liked ;)
>
> FYI: generating gerbers in a Makefile is much more reliable anyway :-)
>
Would it be a huge deal to simply put pin numbers on their own layer?  
Named something like: "notes-do-not-fab.gbr"?

- Raw text -