delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | dj AT delorie DOT com |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.theimps.com |
X-Spam-Level: | |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT |
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 | |
From: | Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> |
To: | Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> |
Cc: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, geda-user AT delorie DOT com, |
geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net | |
Subject: | [geda-user] Re: [Geda-developers] git.geda-project.org permissions change |
References: | <87fvtffapt DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> |
<BEA3A8DC-904B-4C5A-A357-8867F94D2C05 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
<201309082104 DOT r88L4Rx2003804 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<522CE8ED DOT 2040200 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
Date: | Sun, 08 Sep 2013 22:51:24 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: | <522CE8ED.2040200@jump-ing.de> (Markus Hitter's message of "Sun, |
08 Sep 2013 23:15:25 +0200") | |
Message-ID: | <87vc2baso3.fsf@harrington.peter-b.co.uk> |
User-Agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> writes: > Am 08.09.2013 23:04, schrieb DJ Delorie: >> I defer to Peter's git expertise in setting up the git stuff. If our >> previous practices were dangerous, we need to change them, despite any >> "convenience" of being able to work around the system's intended use. > > To date I still wait for somebody showing me an incident where harm > actually happened. Instead, Peter told us he actually uses exactly the > workflow I use myself, outlined a week ago, and is used by many other > projects, too. So much to his "expertise". Maybe there was a breakdown in communication somewhere (maybe my e-mails were not getting through or perhaps my English was not clear enough), but I'm sure that I explained, with examples, how methods that work well in a personal repository (that only a single developer commits to) often are not appropriate for a repository that multiple developers collaborate in. stgit is a good example of a tool that I find ideal for personal repositories, but I would never in a million years use it on a repository that other people might commit to. I apologise for misleading you, if you interpreted me differently. Peter =2D-=20 Dr Peter Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIs8VwACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpr/TQCdFJtPGVywWl+3Ds6fzleJcVWW M8EAmgMM7dwtJLpVWf4npi0Y4Q26FA5I =OF8W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |