delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.theimps.com |
X-Spam-Level: | |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT |
shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 | |
From: | Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> |
To: | Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> |
Cc: | geda-admins AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net, geda-developers AT lists DOT launchpad DOT net, |
geda-user AT delorie DOT com | |
Subject: | [geda-user] Re: git.geda-project.org permissions change |
References: | <87fvtffapt DOT fsf AT harrington DOT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> |
<BEA3A8DC-904B-4C5A-A357-8867F94D2C05 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
Date: | Sun, 08 Sep 2013 22:39:32 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: | <BEA3A8DC-904B-4C5A-A357-8867F94D2C05@jump-ing.de> (Markus |
Hitter's message of "Sun, 8 Sep 2013 22:10:48 +0200") | |
Message-ID: | <871u4zc7sb.fsf_-_@harrington.peter-b.co.uk> |
User-Agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable And the expected drama ensues... *sigh* Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de> writes: > Am 08.09.2013 um 20:07 schrieb Peter TB Brett: > >> I've now changed the default git push policy for all repos on >> geda-project.org: >> >> - @admins have the ability to git push and git push --force >> >> - Other developers have the ability to git push only. > > Does this apply to the pcb repo and all the branches in there, too? Yes. It's a change to the default setting; maintainers are welcome to adopt different settings on a project-by-project basis. In the case of PCB, that would be DJ Delorie and/or Peter Clifton. [1] > If yes, I consider this to be a severe privilege misuse and active > prohibition of the workflow happening in the pcb repo for the last two > years. I'm very sorry to hear that you feel that way. > If you're so keen on getting rid of me and my work, please be honest > say so directly. Undoubtly you won't be able to force me into a less > effective and more error-prone wrokflow just to satisfy your personal > taste. Who said anything about getting rid of you or your work? Beruhige dich, bitte. Peter [1] I notice that you decided *not* to quote the relevant part of my original e-mail when you decided to whinge to geda-user: Peter TB Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> writes: > This can be adjusted by specific projects' maintainers if they wish, in > order to better suit the desired git workflow for their projects. But I suppose that would have made it harder to shout, "Help, help, I'm being oppressed!" =2D-=20 Dr Peter Brett <peter AT peter-b DOT co DOT uk> --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIs7pQACgkQZ7Gbq7g7vpqJQQCfZLpElA+FOtCUeRzikJs29iJR 7ZMAnj3GdIuqYS3WaexXVaAt+V8U2qUh =sVGl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |