delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-TCPREMOTEIP: | 207.224.51.38 |
X-Authenticated-UID: | jpd AT noqsi DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] VE |
From: | John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <20130901043811.GA18909@recycle.lbl.gov> |
Date: | Sun, 1 Sep 2013 12:47:54 -0600 |
Message-Id: | <1E387459-44FD-4E10-96EB-1D0E787B94D6@noqsi.com> |
References: | <CAGRhJMag+hNGutkiG6Mgr9+vxaSynkNEajR0HE2gs8GeZM0o0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130901043811 DOT GA18909 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailer: | Apple Mail (2.1085) |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r81IlrxX006507 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Larry Doolittle wrote: > I'm very interested in being > able to write generic numeric code, have it simulate (at first) > at "infinite" precision, then establish real-life bounds and precision > needs based on SNR goals, resulting in concrete scaled-fixed-point > variables. That is well beyond existing language capabilities. Well, you can't really simulate at infinite precision. However, you *can* do algebraic circuit analysis at infinite precision. That's what gnetlist -g mathematica is for. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |