delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-SourceIP: | 95.97.163.245 |
X-Authenticated-Sender: | b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl |
Message-ID: | <521B8AD4.4020000@iae.nl> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:05:24 +0200 |
From: | myken <myken AT iae DOT nl> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
CC: | Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Tutorial: VHDL with gEDA |
References: | <521B22D8 DOT 3030707 AT iae DOT nl> <1377531768 DOT 2150 DOT 11 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> |
In-Reply-To: | <1377531768.2150.11.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
> Fine -- indeed I was wondering in the last weeks what you was doing with > gEDA and VHDL -- my initial guess was that you tried to generate > schematics from VHDL code. You are absolutely right. That was/is my primary trigger. But first I had to figure out how the gschem to VHDL path works. So why not let everybody profit from my work ;-) Unfortunately I got stonewalled by the way gschem/gnetlist (VHDL backend) handles buses. I haven't solved that one. > Maybe you should start your tutorial indeed with a short remark what you > intend -- starting with statements about bugs is very negative in Good point. I'll add an introduction. > general. And from my knowledge the way schematic -> VHDL is not very > common, VHDL was invented to allow textual input, maybe generate > schematic output for verifying the result. Of course the direction > schematic VHDL may be justified, i.e. for very special digital > circuits. Oh really? I usually use the schematics to define the architecture or communicate about the architecture and fill in the working block later. But I guess that makes me special :-) > I had only a short look at your page -- is my impression wrong that your > general used font is smaller than the users default? It should not be. I'll test it on an other machine later tonight.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |